LinkedIn Campaign Review

Ad Creative Consolidation

"Launches in Jeopardy" Webinar — Two Active Campaigns
Data: April 2026 Updated: April 28, 2026 Consolidation implemented
Campaign 1 of 2
Conversion Campaign

ID: 583213904 · Ads live since Apr 20 (4 days) · Drives to landing page

$120
Total Spend
6,941
Impressions
27
Clicks
0.39%
Overall CTR
Performance by Image Format
Square and vertical are working. Horizontal is not.
Square
0.53% CTR · $4.17 CPC
13 clicks
Vertical
0.53% CTR · $4.37 CPC
13 clicks
Horizontal
0.05%
1 click

Horizontal received 2,026 impressions and generated 1 click. On mobile, horizontal images lose visual impact in the feed. All three horizontal variants can be paused.

Performance by Ad Copy Variant
VariantAdsSpendImpClicksCTRCPC
v2 Top3$49.262,070120.58%$4.10
v33$51.083,114110.35%$4.64
v13$18.561,36630.22%$6.19
v4 Jared1$1.1139110.26%$1.11
Total10$120.016,941270.39%$4.44
0.58%

v2 leads on engagement

Highest CTR and lowest CPC ($4.10). This copy angle is clearly resonating with the Conversion audience.

3,114

v3 has highest reach

LinkedIn is serving v3 more than any other variant, but CTR (0.35%) is lower. More people see it, fewer click.

0.22%

v1 trails both

Lowest CTR, highest CPC ($6.19), fewest clicks. This copy angle isn't compelling the Conversion audience.

All 10 Ads — Individual Performance
AdAd IDFormatCopySpendImpClicksCTRCPCAction
vertical_v21246895874Verticalv2$26.5774450.67%$5.31Pause
square_v21247091584Squarev2$22.6979370.88%$3.24Keep
square_v31244618584Squarev3$21.7088140.45%$5.43Pause
vertical_v31246513034Verticalv3$20.371,41460.42%$3.40Keep
vertical_v11246795964Verticalv1$9.8330120.66%$4.91Keep
horizontal_v31247187234Horizontalv3$9.0181910.12%$9.01Pause
square_v11246895864Squarev1$8.7339110.26%$8.73Pause
square_v41275491054Squarev4$1.1139110.26%$1.11Pause
horizontal_v21244919274Horizontalv2$0.0053300.00%Keep
horizontal_v11244919264Horizontalv1$0.0067400.00%Pause
Conversion Campaign — Recommendation
Keep 4, pause 6

square_v2 Keep

$22.69 · 793 imp · 7 clicks · 0.88% CTR · $3.24 CPC
Best-performing single ad. Highest CTR, lowest CPC.

vertical_v3 Keep

$20.37 · 1,414 imp · 6 clicks · 0.42% CTR · $3.40 CPC
Highest impression volume, low CPC. Keeps v3 copy in the mix for comparison.

vertical_v1 Keep

$9.83 · 301 imp · 2 clicks · 0.66% CTR · $4.91 CPC
Strong CTR for its impression volume. Keeps a v1 variant active to continue testing copy.

horizontal_v2 Keep

$0.00 · 533 imp · 0 clicks
Kept active to build more data. Horizontal format needs more runway before a final call.

What we're pausing: vertical_v2, square_v3, square_v1, square_v4, horizontal_v3, and horizontal_v1.

Campaign 2 of 2

Lead Gen Campaign

ID: 585210084 · Ads live since Apr 21 (3 days) · Native LinkedIn form
$300
Total Spend
3,929
Impressions
17
Clicks
0.43%
Overall CTR

The Lead Gen campaign has a clear standout. The top creative is pulling a 0.71% CTR — 1.5x–3.5x higher than the rest of the field (0.20–0.47%). That's not a marginal edge; it's a meaningful signal that this creative is resonating in a way the others aren't. LinkedIn's guidance to run multiple creatives applies to evergreen campaigns still in a learning phase — testing messaging, audiences, and formats over time. This campaign is past that point. The data has spoken, and concentrating budget behind the proven winner is the right call for a short-window campaign.

Performance by Image Format
All three formats are generating clicks. No clear loser.
Horizontal
0.60% CTR · $17.40 CPC
4 clicks
Square
0.51% CTR · $20.41 CPC
8 clicks
Vertical
0.30% CTR · $13.43 CPC
5 clicks
FormatAdsSpendImpClicksCTRCPC
Square4$163.251,58480.51%$20.41
Horizontal3$69.6066840.60%$17.40
Vertical3$67.141,67750.30%$13.43
Total10$299.993,929170.43%$17.65

Key difference from Conversion: Horizontal is the highest CTR here (0.60%), while it was effectively dead in the Conversion campaign (0.05%). Lead Gen Forms open natively, so the click threshold is lower. Vertical has the most impressions (1,677) at the lowest CPC ($13.43).

Performance by Ad Copy Variant
VariantAdsSpendImpClicksCTRCPC
v1 Top3$160.602,157110.51%$14.60
v4 Jared1$62.8122920.87%$31.41
v33$76.581,12640.36%$19.14
v23$0.0041700.00%
Total10$299.993,929170.43%$17.65
0.87%

v4 (Jared) is the standout

0.87% CTR — 1.5x–3.5x higher than every other variant in the campaign. The personal image creative is resonating in a way the others aren't. Budget consolidates here.

$14.60

v1 had volume, not signal

v1 drove the most clicks (11) and lowest CPC, but at 0.51% CTR it's running at less than 60% of Jared's engagement rate. Strong relative to the field — not strong enough to split budget.

$0.00

v2 isn't spending

417 impressions, zero clicks, zero spend. The Conversion winner is completely flat in Lead Gen — a reminder that what works in one campaign environment won't automatically transfer.

All 10 Ads — Individual Performance
AdAd IDFormatCopySpendImpClicksCTRCPCAction
square_v11244218744Squarev1$78.511,02650.49%$15.70Pause
square_v41275986274Squarev4$62.8122920.87%$31.41Keep
vertical_v11244617954Verticalv1$54.1194540.42%$13.53Pause
horizontal_v31244520014Horizontalv3$41.6241420.48%$20.81Pause
horizontal_v11244519954Horizontalv1$27.9818621.08%$13.99Pause
square_v31245417644Squarev3$21.933213.13%$21.93Pause
vertical_v31244719194Verticalv3$13.0368010.15%$13.03Pause
square_v21246018494Squarev2$0.0029700.00%Pause
horizontal_v21246217584Horizontalv2$0.006800.00%Pause
vertical_v21246018504Verticalv2$0.005200.00%Pause
Lead Gen Campaign — Recommendation
Concentrate budget on the winner. Pause all others.

square_v4 — Jared's image Keep

$62.81 · 229 imp · 2 clicks · 0.87% CTR · $31.41 CPC
The standout creative at 0.87% CTR — 1.5x–3.5x higher than the rest of the field (0.20–0.47%). That's not a marginal edge; it's a clear signal this creative is resonating in a way the others aren't. Remaining creatives are paused (not deleted), and all budget consolidates here.

A note on LinkedIn's "run more creatives" guidance: That rule applies to evergreen campaigns still in a learning phase. This is a short-window campaign and the data has already spoken. When there's a proven winner, concentrating budget behind it is the right call — rotating back to weaker creatives would dilute results, not improve them.

Watch for frequency fatigue: Monitor frequency closely. If it climbs above 4–5 within the campaign window, revisit with a variation of this creative rather than reactivating the lower-performing ads.

Cross-Campaign Insight

The two campaigns favor opposite copy variants. v2 dominates Conversion (0.58% CTR, $4.10 CPC) while v1 dominates Lead Gen (0.51% CTR, 11 of 17 clicks). v2 has zero clicks in Lead Gen. This reflects different user behavior between landing-page clicks and native form opens. The recommendations for each campaign are intentionally different — we're not standardizing on one "winning" creative.

DimensionConversion CampaignLead Gen Campaign
Best copy variantv2 (0.58% CTR)v1 (0.51% CTR, 11 clicks)
Worst copy variantv1 (0.22% CTR)v2 (0.00% CTR)
Best formatSquare + Vertical (tied 0.53%)Horizontal (0.60% CTR)
Worst formatHorizontal (0.05% CTR)Vertical (0.30% CTR)
v4 (Jared's image)$1.11 spend, too earlyStandout at 0.87% CTR — 1.5x–3.5x the field
Ads kept4 (square_v2, vertical_v3, vertical_v1, horizontal_v2)1 (square_v4 — Jared)
Ads paused69
Next Steps
Approved — changes implementedPauses are live in both campaigns as of April 28. Remaining creatives are paused, not deleted, and can be reactivated if needed.
Monitor frequency in Lead GenWith budget concentrated on a single creative, watch frequency closely. If it exceeds 4–5 within the campaign window, introduce a variation of the winning creative rather than reactivating lower-performing ads.
Two-week reviewReconvene to assess performance with consolidated budget. At that point, make a final creative cut for Conversion (targeting 2 active variants) and evaluate whether Lead Gen needs a creative variation to combat frequency fatigue.